Edgemoor Neighborhood Plan Update
Process
1. Organization (March 2007)
Set up the Neighborhood Plan
Committee. Outreach to the community for input to the outline that meets the
standards of the Bellingham Comprehensive Plan and the State Growth Management
Act.
2. Community Input (April-May 15, 2007)
Develop a questionnaire for all
neighborhood input including stated times and dates for public comment, public
meetings, and a website for getting a copy.
The questionnaire was mailed to Edgemoor residents in April, 2007, with
a deadline of May 15,2007.
3. Neighborhood Plan Draft Outline (May16-July15, 2007)
Assimilate the results of the questionnaire
and complete a draft outline for the Plan Update.
4. Community input on the Draft Outline
Draft
outline posted on the web site and a neighborhood meeting planned to “take
comments for revision”.
5. Neighborhood Plan Draft
Write the Draft of the Edgemoor
Neighborhood Plan.
6. Community Input on the Plan Draft
Publicize the Neighborhood Plan
Committee meetings in the monthly ENA newsletter to encourage participation by
Edgemoor residents.
7. Neighborhood Plan Final Draft
Submit
the Final Plan to the City of Bellingham Planning Department for approval.
I suggest we accept this process for
ourselves. It proposes two major work
products with public input and revision for both. Please recognize that this does not include
any proposals to change the zoning of the Edgemoor Neighborhood, there are no
side trips proposed to add anything to the Comprehensive Plan which other
neighborhoods have tried, and further, we have no proposal to do anything with
the subdivision requirement which are separate from the body of the other
zoning requirements and have already created anomalies within Edgemoor. Note that we have a gated community in our
midst as well as a unique district which proposes dense development on part of
a tract of land and permanent open space on the rest. So far, we have not addressed these
developments nor were they addressed in the Planning Academy programs.
Subdivision Regulation, or Planned
Unit Development Guidelines, seem to allow major flexibility to the developer
in response to trade-offs for what is broadly identified as public benefit
(parks, road upgrades, and the like).
It is not clear to me if that
includes provision for uses such as convenience stores, churches, public
meeting places and the like.
I will be away in January and most
of February and possibly in late December so my availability is limited this
year.
If we dawdle too much and do not set
any timetable for completion of any of the remaining tasks, events out of our
control are likely to overtake us with unknown effect. If we complete the process, speak for what we
want, we will have fulfilled our mandate and accomplished what we set out to
do.
As a result, I suggest we:
1. Accept the outline of steps as
was proposed for Fairhaven Neighbors and add our own completion dates.
2. Present a timeline and initial
draft Outline to the Association as a whole before the end of the year for the
Association approval.(November, 2007)
3. Start the Outline Community Input/
Outline revision process toward the end of the year. (December)
4.Complete the draft Plan in early 2008,
perhaps by the end of March, 2008 and plan a first submission to the City by
the end of May.
Martin Nickerson
11/19/2007